Warisan rep calls Hajiji’s denial of Borneo Bloc a ‘classic case of contradictory politics’

TAWAU (March 6): The denial of the so-called Borneo Bloc by Chief Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Hajiji Noor has been described as a ‘classic example of contradictory political positioning’.

In pointing this out, Sri Tanjong assemblyman Justin Wong said that denying something previously raised by the same leadership reflects inconsistency and raises questions about integrity in governance and commitment to principles once strongly advocated.

“When a leader denies or contradicts statements previously made, it shows that some are willing to set aside principles and public trust to maintain their position. This also suggests that the repeated emphasis on autonomy and the defence of Sabah’s rights over the years were merely rhetoric,” he said.

He noted that media reports from several years ago showed Hajiji had held discussions with Sarawak on forming a Borneo Bloc.

“At that time, he stated that the Borneo Bloc was meant to ensure political stability and support a federal government that would benefit both Sabah and Sarawak. Yet today, that very position appears to have been denied,” Wong added.

He believes the denial may have been made to avoid the issue becoming sensitive ahead of upcoming elections and to prevent potential differences with parties in the federal government.

“When a leader fails to uphold the trust of the people, the consequences are far-reaching. It damages personal credibility, raises questions about administrative accountability, and weakens public confidence in government institutions,” he said.

Wong responded to Hajiji’s statement that Malaysia should not be divided into political blocs and that all states should work together for national stability.

However, he stressed that the concept of a Borneo Bloc is not intended to divide the country.

“In my view, the term Borneo Bloc simply reflects the rise of local parties in Sabah and growing awareness among Sabahans of their rights and interests. This development is beneficial, not harmful, to Sabah,” he said.

He emphasised that Warisan has consistently fought for Sabah’s rights, including the demand for the return of 40 per cent of Sabah’s net revenue, in line with the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963.

“This struggle is not merely about forming the government but about ensuring Sabah’s rightful interests are not compromised or traded away for political gain,” he said.

He added that cooperation between Sabah and Sarawak could catalyse the implementation of decisive policies and more meaningful reforms.

“We must recognise that Sabah and Sarawak do not possess a one-third majority to exercise veto power alone. However, by building consensus with Sarawak, they can still defend the rights and interests of the people of Borneo,” he said.

According to Wong, strong voter support for local parties reflects the people’s desire for Sabah’s rights and interests to continue being defended by local leadership.